<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 637 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779841</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed the appeal and directed the AO to grant deduction under section 80P(2)(d) for interest income from investments with cooperative banks. Although the return was filed belatedly (after the CBDT-prescribed due date) and the AO had denied the deduction for non-compliance with section 80AC, the Tribunal followed binding precedents that had permitted the same deduction in identical circumstances and therefore set aside the denial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 09:39:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 637 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779841</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed the appeal and directed the AO to grant deduction under section 80P(2)(d) for interest income from investments with cooperative banks. Although the return was filed belatedly (after the CBDT-prescribed due date) and the AO had denied the deduction for non-compliance with section 80AC, the Tribunal followed binding precedents that had permitted the same deduction in identical circumstances and therefore set aside the denial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>