<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 639 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779843</link>
    <description>ITAT HYDERABAD - AT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s view that interest on fixed deposits is not eligible for deduction under s.10AA unless deposits were made for business expediency or inextricably linked to export operations; interest earned on surplus investments held merely to earn income remains &quot;income from other sources.&quot; The tribunal affirmed reliance on commercial-expediency principles and consistency where interest had earlier been assessed as other income. Issues regarding incorrect book-profit computation under s.115JB, disallowance under s.43B for leave encashment, and a potential double addition of interest were remanded to the AO for verification and fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 09:39:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 639 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779843</link>
      <description>ITAT HYDERABAD - AT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s view that interest on fixed deposits is not eligible for deduction under s.10AA unless deposits were made for business expediency or inextricably linked to export operations; interest earned on surplus investments held merely to earn income remains &quot;income from other sources.&quot; The tribunal affirmed reliance on commercial-expediency principles and consistency where interest had earlier been assessed as other income. Issues regarding incorrect book-profit computation under s.115JB, disallowance under s.43B for leave encashment, and a potential double addition of interest were remanded to the AO for verification and fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>