<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 641 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779845</link>
    <description>ITAT, CUTTACK upheld that the appellant was given adequate opportunity and dismissed ground 1. On estimation of income, the Tribunal found the reduced profit margin justified and directed the AO to apply a 4% profit rate on turnover (partly allowing the appeal). Regarding additions u/s 69A for SBN deposits during demonetization, the Tribunal held those deposits arose from cash sales already estimated under s.145(3) and deleted the unexplained-money addition in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 13:07:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 641 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779845</link>
      <description>ITAT, CUTTACK upheld that the appellant was given adequate opportunity and dismissed ground 1. On estimation of income, the Tribunal found the reduced profit margin justified and directed the AO to apply a 4% profit rate on turnover (partly allowing the appeal). Regarding additions u/s 69A for SBN deposits during demonetization, the Tribunal held those deposits arose from cash sales already estimated under s.145(3) and deleted the unexplained-money addition in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>