<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 644 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779848</link>
    <description>ITAT DELHI - AT held the reassessment initiated under s.148 was invalid because the Pr.CIT&#039;s approval was mechanical and lacked independent application of mind required by s.151. The Pr.CIT merely recorded &quot;Yes, as per O/s.&quot; and granted blanket approval without examining reasons; similar mass approvals on order sheets corroborated this. The Tribunal quashed the s.148 notice as bad in law and allowed the assessee&#039;s Grounds of Appeal Nos. 1 and 2.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 09:39:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 644 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779848</link>
      <description>ITAT DELHI - AT held the reassessment initiated under s.148 was invalid because the Pr.CIT&#039;s approval was mechanical and lacked independent application of mind required by s.151. The Pr.CIT merely recorded &quot;Yes, as per O/s.&quot; and granted blanket approval without examining reasons; similar mass approvals on order sheets corroborated this. The Tribunal quashed the s.148 notice as bad in law and allowed the assessee&#039;s Grounds of Appeal Nos. 1 and 2.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>