<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 658 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779862</link>
    <description>ITAT PUNE - AT held that the penalty under section 270A is deleted because the taxpayer legitimately reclassified income from business income to long-term capital gains based on judicial precedents and CBDT Circular No.06/2016, so the case did not constitute under-reporting or misreporting of income. Relying on an earlier ITAT DELHI decision, the Tribunal allowed the effective grounds of appeal and set aside the impugned penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 12:16:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 658 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779862</link>
      <description>ITAT PUNE - AT held that the penalty under section 270A is deleted because the taxpayer legitimately reclassified income from business income to long-term capital gains based on judicial precedents and CBDT Circular No.06/2016, so the case did not constitute under-reporting or misreporting of income. Relying on an earlier ITAT DELHI decision, the Tribunal allowed the effective grounds of appeal and set aside the impugned penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>