<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 659 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779863</link>
    <description>ITAT held that penalty under s.271G cannot be upheld where the assessing officer failed to identify which specific Rule 10D document(s) were not maintained. Penalty was imposed for failure to benchmark international and specified domestic transactions, which does not constitute the statutory ground for s.271G. Tribunal affirmed the order deleting the penalty and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 09:39:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 659 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779863</link>
      <description>ITAT held that penalty under s.271G cannot be upheld where the assessing officer failed to identify which specific Rule 10D document(s) were not maintained. Penalty was imposed for failure to benchmark international and specified domestic transactions, which does not constitute the statutory ground for s.271G. Tribunal affirmed the order deleting the penalty and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>