<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 669 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779873</link>
    <description>High Court set aside an adjudication order for failure to serve the show-cause notice and for breach of natural justice, noting the petitioner learned of proceedings only after the order. The court remitted the matter to respondent No.2 for fresh consideration, directing that the petitioner be given an opportunity to file a reply and supporting documents and that respondent No.2 pass fresh orders in accordance with law. Petition allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 09:39:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 669 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779873</link>
      <description>High Court set aside an adjudication order for failure to serve the show-cause notice and for breach of natural justice, noting the petitioner learned of proceedings only after the order. The court remitted the matter to respondent No.2 for fresh consideration, directing that the petitioner be given an opportunity to file a reply and supporting documents and that respondent No.2 pass fresh orders in accordance with law. Petition allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>