https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779875 HC dismissed the petition, upholding the technical disqualification of the bidder and refusal to open its financial bid. The court found the bid non-responsive for failing to certify cleared stock under Tariff Code 4802, omitting the required "S.S. (surface sized)" designation in the declaration and sample, and thus not meeting the NIT's specification for S.S. Maplitho printing paper. Challenges to the tender specifications were not raised; respondents' decision to reject the bid was held to be valid and unimpeachable. en-us Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Oct 2025 09:39:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779875 HC dismissed the petition, upholding the technical disqualification of the bidder and refusal to open its financial bid. The court found the bid non-responsive for failing to certify cleared stock under Tariff Code 4802, omitting the required "S.S. (surface sized)" designation in the declaration and sample, and thus not meeting the NIT's specification for S.S. Maplitho printing paper. Challenges to the tender specifications were not raised; respondents' decision to reject the bid was held to be valid and unimpeachable. Case-Laws GST Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779875