https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47299 Rule 5 of the Hot Re-rolling Steel Mills Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997 was considered in the context of a re-determination of annual capacity under Rule 4(2) after a change in parameters, where the revised capacity was lower than actual production for the 1996-1997 financial year. The Court framed the precise question whether Rule 5 applies in that situation and treated the issue as requiring authoritative determination. The Tribunal was directed to refer the statement of the case, together with the formulated question of law, to the High Court for opinion. en-us Fri, 28 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:36:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47299 Rule 5 of the Hot Re-rolling Steel Mills Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997 was considered in the context of a re-determination of annual capacity under Rule 4(2) after a change in parameters, where the revised capacity was lower than actual production for the 1996-1997 financial year. The Court framed the precise question whether Rule 5 applies in that situation and treated the issue as requiring authoritative determination. The Tribunal was directed to refer the statement of the case, together with the formulated question of law, to the High Court for opinion. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 28 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47299