<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1496 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464241</link>
    <description>Where reassessment orders under Section 148A(d) and consequential notices under Section 148 were already covered by a recent binding judgment, and the Revenue accepted that position, the reassessment action could not be sustained. The High Court quashed and set aside the impugned orders and notices, and all consequential proceedings fell with the principal action. Other contentions were left open for future proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 16:01:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1496 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464241</link>
      <description>Where reassessment orders under Section 148A(d) and consequential notices under Section 148 were already covered by a recent binding judgment, and the Revenue accepted that position, the reassessment action could not be sustained. The High Court quashed and set aside the impugned orders and notices, and all consequential proceedings fell with the principal action. Other contentions were left open for future proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>