<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Mandatory pre-deposit under Section 129E applies to duty drawback recovery for non-submission of export realisation proof</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93277</link>
    <description>HC held that recovery of duty drawback availed for non-submission of proof of export realisation attracts the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 129E of the Customs Act, and established precedents of this Court, the BHC and CESTAT preclude judicial relaxation of that statutory pre-deposit merely because the petitioner&#039;s bank account was frozen by the department. The statutory right of appeal is subject to legislative preconditions and is not absolute. The petitioner was permitted to make the requisite pre-deposit to contest the appeal on merits. Petition disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 08:54:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 08:54:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Mandatory pre-deposit under Section 129E applies to duty drawback recovery for non-submission of export realisation proof</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93277</link>
      <description>HC held that recovery of duty drawback availed for non-submission of proof of export realisation attracts the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 129E of the Customs Act, and established precedents of this Court, the BHC and CESTAT preclude judicial relaxation of that statutory pre-deposit merely because the petitioner&#039;s bank account was frozen by the department. The statutory right of appeal is subject to legislative preconditions and is not absolute. The petitioner was permitted to make the requisite pre-deposit to contest the appeal on merits. Petition disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 08:54:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>