<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>SSI exemption upheld: job-workers&#039; manufacture on loan-license not clubbed with principal&#039;s turnover to avoid double taxation</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93271</link>
    <description>CESTAT affirmed the learned Member (Judicial)&#039;s view that the appellants are entitled to SSI exemption and that turnover of goods manufactured by third-party job-workers on loan-license or principal-to-principal basis cannot be clubbed with the appellants&#039; own clearances. The Tribunal held that including such job-workers&#039; clearances would result in double taxation and that the job-workers are the manufacturers for exemption-calculation purposes. Accordingly, the appellants&#039; appeals are to be allowed and the Revenue&#039;s appeal dismissed on this point. The matter is to be placed before the original Division Bench to record the majority view; no determination was made on valuation or limitation issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 08:54:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 08:54:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>SSI exemption upheld: job-workers&#039; manufacture on loan-license not clubbed with principal&#039;s turnover to avoid double taxation</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93271</link>
      <description>CESTAT affirmed the learned Member (Judicial)&#039;s view that the appellants are entitled to SSI exemption and that turnover of goods manufactured by third-party job-workers on loan-license or principal-to-principal basis cannot be clubbed with the appellants&#039; own clearances. The Tribunal held that including such job-workers&#039; clearances would result in double taxation and that the job-workers are the manufacturers for exemption-calculation purposes. Accordingly, the appellants&#039; appeals are to be allowed and the Revenue&#039;s appeal dismissed on this point. The matter is to be placed before the original Division Bench to record the majority view; no determination was made on valuation or limitation issues.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 08:54:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>