<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 549 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779753</link>
    <description>Independent registered manufacturers and loan-license or job-work units clearing goods on their own account were not treated as the assessee&#039;s manufacturers merely because the assessee&#039;s brand name was used. Their clearances were therefore not clubbed with the assessee&#039;s turnover for Small Scale Exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-CE, because the decisive factor was whether the goods were manufactured on behalf of the assessee or by separate units acting independently. Where those units were independently registered and paying duty, their value could not be added to the assessee&#039;s aggregate clearances. On that basis, SSI exemption remained available and clubbing was impermissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 08:53:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 549 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779753</link>
      <description>Independent registered manufacturers and loan-license or job-work units clearing goods on their own account were not treated as the assessee&#039;s manufacturers merely because the assessee&#039;s brand name was used. Their clearances were therefore not clubbed with the assessee&#039;s turnover for Small Scale Exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-CE, because the decisive factor was whether the goods were manufactured on behalf of the assessee or by separate units acting independently. Where those units were independently registered and paying duty, their value could not be added to the assessee&#039;s aggregate clearances. On that basis, SSI exemption remained available and clubbing was impermissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>