<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 549 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779753</link>
    <description>CESTAT (Allahabad LB) held that units manufacturing goods on loan-license or principal-to-principal basis are the manufacturers for SSI exemption purposes and their turnover cannot be clubbed with the claimant&#039;s own clearances. Applying the SC precedent in similar facts, the bench affirmed the Judicial Member&#039;s view that the respondent claiming exemption (who uses its own brand while getting manufacture done by job-workers) is entitled to SSI benefit and the departmental plea to include job-workers&#039; clearances in the claimant&#039;s turnover is rejected. The matter is placed before the Division Bench for majority view.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 08:53:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 549 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779753</link>
      <description>CESTAT (Allahabad LB) held that units manufacturing goods on loan-license or principal-to-principal basis are the manufacturers for SSI exemption purposes and their turnover cannot be clubbed with the claimant&#039;s own clearances. Applying the SC precedent in similar facts, the bench affirmed the Judicial Member&#039;s view that the respondent claiming exemption (who uses its own brand while getting manufacture done by job-workers) is entitled to SSI benefit and the departmental plea to include job-workers&#039; clearances in the claimant&#039;s turnover is rejected. The matter is placed before the Division Bench for majority view.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>