<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 556 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779760</link>
    <description>HC held that DRI officers are not &quot;proper officers&quot; to issue SCNs under Section 28(4), following the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling which effectively overruled the contrary earlier decision. The HC allowed the appeal, set aside the initiation of recovery proceedings as lacking jurisdiction, and restored the appeal before CESTAT to its original position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 08:53:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 556 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779760</link>
      <description>HC held that DRI officers are not &quot;proper officers&quot; to issue SCNs under Section 28(4), following the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling which effectively overruled the contrary earlier decision. The HC allowed the appeal, set aside the initiation of recovery proceedings as lacking jurisdiction, and restored the appeal before CESTAT to its original position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>