<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 563 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779767</link>
    <description>ITAT MUMBAI - AT allowed the appeal and directed deletion of additions made for labour charges. The assessee furnished ledger confirmations, ITR, PAN, Aadhaar, bank statements and labour vouchers, and payments were subject to TDS. The tribunal held that non-response by third parties to notices under s.133(6) alone did not justify the addition where documentary evidence established identity and genuineness of payments; accordingly, the AO&#039;s addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 08:53:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 563 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779767</link>
      <description>ITAT MUMBAI - AT allowed the appeal and directed deletion of additions made for labour charges. The assessee furnished ledger confirmations, ITR, PAN, Aadhaar, bank statements and labour vouchers, and payments were subject to TDS. The tribunal held that non-response by third parties to notices under s.133(6) alone did not justify the addition where documentary evidence established identity and genuineness of payments; accordingly, the AO&#039;s addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>