<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 573 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779777</link>
    <description>ITAT COCHIN - AT held that commission paid to a non-resident supplier for procuring merchandise for a duty-free shop did not constitute &quot;fees for technical services&quot; under the India-UK DTAA, since no transfer of technical knowledge occurred. The tribunal found the lower authorities erred in characterizing the payments as FTS and set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order insofar as it concerned the non-resident transactions. Appeals filed by the assessee were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 08:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 573 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779777</link>
      <description>ITAT COCHIN - AT held that commission paid to a non-resident supplier for procuring merchandise for a duty-free shop did not constitute &quot;fees for technical services&quot; under the India-UK DTAA, since no transfer of technical knowledge occurred. The tribunal found the lower authorities erred in characterizing the payments as FTS and set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order insofar as it concerned the non-resident transactions. Appeals filed by the assessee were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>