<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 580 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779784</link>
    <description>ITAT PUNE (AT) held that a selected comparable was not comparable to the assessee because company records showed pure manufacturing while the assessee carried on significant trading and failed the 75% trading-turnover filter; the comparable must be deleted from the list and Ground No.2 is allowed. The tribunal directed the AO/TPO to remove that comparable and to rework the profit-level indicator average by incorporating the other comparable&#039;s accepted margin of 2.92%.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 08:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 580 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779784</link>
      <description>ITAT PUNE (AT) held that a selected comparable was not comparable to the assessee because company records showed pure manufacturing while the assessee carried on significant trading and failed the 75% trading-turnover filter; the comparable must be deleted from the list and Ground No.2 is allowed. The tribunal directed the AO/TPO to remove that comparable and to rework the profit-level indicator average by incorporating the other comparable&#039;s accepted margin of 2.92%.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>