<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 581 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779785</link>
    <description>ITAT held that the AO had made adequate enquiries into share transactions, which were executed through a registered broker and reflected in the assessee&#039;s demat account, and that the assessee was a regular trader rather than an isolated actor. PCIT failed to point to any evidence showing the transactions were fraudulent or accommodation entries. The Tribunal found the AO&#039;s view to be plausible and set aside the order passed u/s 263, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 08:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 581 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779785</link>
      <description>ITAT held that the AO had made adequate enquiries into share transactions, which were executed through a registered broker and reflected in the assessee&#039;s demat account, and that the assessee was a regular trader rather than an isolated actor. PCIT failed to point to any evidence showing the transactions were fraudulent or accommodation entries. The Tribunal found the AO&#039;s view to be plausible and set aside the order passed u/s 263, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>