https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779790 ITAT HYDERABAD - AT allowed the appeal, holding that CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal in limine for non-prosecution. Under s.250(6) CIT(A) must frame points of determination and give a reasoned discussion before passing an order, and even an ex parte disposal must address merits. The matter is remanded to CIT(A) for de novo disposal on merits after affording the assessee a reasonable opportunity of hearing. en-us Fri, 10 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Oct 2025 08:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779790 ITAT HYDERABAD - AT allowed the appeal, holding that CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal in limine for non-prosecution. Under s.250(6) CIT(A) must frame points of determination and give a reasoned discussion before passing an order, and even an ex parte disposal must address merits. The matter is remanded to CIT(A) for de novo disposal on merits after affording the assessee a reasonable opportunity of hearing. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 10 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779790