<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 587 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779791</link>
    <description>ITAT (DELHI - AT) held that additions under s.69A relating to alleged unexplained receipt of Rs.62 lakh could not be sustained. The seized loose paper was undated and therefore related to FY 2020-21 (AY 2021-22), AO produced no corroborative material linking the entries to the assessee, no documents were seized from the assessee, and the audio recordings had no nexus to the assessee. Consequently the addition was deleted and the grounds challenging the addition were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 08:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 587 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779791</link>
      <description>ITAT (DELHI - AT) held that additions under s.69A relating to alleged unexplained receipt of Rs.62 lakh could not be sustained. The seized loose paper was undated and therefore related to FY 2020-21 (AY 2021-22), AO produced no corroborative material linking the entries to the assessee, no documents were seized from the assessee, and the audio recordings had no nexus to the assessee. Consequently the addition was deleted and the grounds challenging the addition were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>