<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 589 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779793</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was whether reassessment for AY 2015-16 could be validly reopened by a notice issued on 27.07.2022, having regard to the limitation under s.149(1) of the IT Act and the claimed extension under TOLA. Applying SC authority holding that TOLA did not extend limitation for such s.148 notices for AY 2015-16, and following consistent HC precedent, the Court held the notice was time-barred and without jurisdiction. Consequently, the impugned reassessment notice and consequential order were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 589 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779793</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was whether reassessment for AY 2015-16 could be validly reopened by a notice issued on 27.07.2022, having regard to the limitation under s.149(1) of the IT Act and the claimed extension under TOLA. Applying SC authority holding that TOLA did not extend limitation for such s.148 notices for AY 2015-16, and following consistent HC precedent, the Court held the notice was time-barred and without jurisdiction. Consequently, the impugned reassessment notice and consequential order were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>