<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 592 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779796</link>
    <description>HC declined to entertain the writ petition challenging three Orders-in-Original concerning alleged fraudulent availment of ITC, holding that questions of fact and natural justice require adjudication in the appellate/assessment process rather than by writ. The court permitted the petitioner to file separate statutory appeals against each order and directed that any amounts already deposited be adjusted against required pre-deposits. The petition was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 08:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 592 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779796</link>
      <description>HC declined to entertain the writ petition challenging three Orders-in-Original concerning alleged fraudulent availment of ITC, holding that questions of fact and natural justice require adjudication in the appellate/assessment process rather than by writ. The court permitted the petitioner to file separate statutory appeals against each order and directed that any amounts already deposited be adjusted against required pre-deposits. The petition was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>