<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 599 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779803</link>
    <description>GST registration cancelled for non-furnishing of returns was not restored through a delayed appeal, as the statutory revocation route had not been pursued within the prescribed time. The Court noted that the petitioner intended to seek revocation before the competent authority and granted liberty to do so within a short period, with the authority to consider the request in accordance with law, including payment of any outstanding tax dues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 08:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 599 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779803</link>
      <description>GST registration cancelled for non-furnishing of returns was not restored through a delayed appeal, as the statutory revocation route had not been pursued within the prescribed time. The Court noted that the petitioner intended to seek revocation before the competent authority and granted liberty to do so within a short period, with the authority to consider the request in accordance with law, including payment of any outstanding tax dues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>