https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779807 SC condoned a 29-day delay in refiling but declined to exercise discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136, dismissing the petition. The court noted allegations concerning availment of fraudulent input tax credit, inadequate personal hearing, and reliance on unclear RUDs; HC had earlier declined to entertain the writ while permitting refiling by way of appeal. Petitioners were granted liberty to pursue alternate statutory remedies. en-us Mon, 08 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Oct 2025 08:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779807 SC condoned a 29-day delay in refiling but declined to exercise discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136, dismissing the petition. The court noted allegations concerning availment of fraudulent input tax credit, inadequate personal hearing, and reliance on unclear RUDs; HC had earlier declined to entertain the writ while permitting refiling by way of appeal. Petitioners were granted liberty to pursue alternate statutory remedies. Case-Laws GST Mon, 08 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779807