<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1653 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464216</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 15-A(1)(o) could not be sustained where diesel oil was imported for use in generator sets and the record showed no sale or clandestine diversion. Mere irregularity in filling Form 31 did not, by itself, establish intent to evade tax or justify an adverse inference of misuse. In the absence of material showing that the goods were brought for resale or other tax evasion, the Tribunal&#039;s finding was unsupported. The penalty was therefore quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2025 16:25:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1653 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464216</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 15-A(1)(o) could not be sustained where diesel oil was imported for use in generator sets and the record showed no sale or clandestine diversion. Mere irregularity in filling Form 31 did not, by itself, establish intent to evade tax or justify an adverse inference of misuse. In the absence of material showing that the goods were brought for resale or other tax evasion, the Tribunal&#039;s finding was unsupported. The penalty was therefore quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>