<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1906 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464224</link>
    <description>ITAT (Agra) granted a stay of the outstanding addition under section 41(1) versus section 68 for 180 days or until appeal disposal, whichever is earlier. The tribunal found a prima facie case for the taxpayer since creditor identities, addresses and confirmations were furnished and subsequent-period payments were shown. It also accepted that the assessee&#039;s continuing industrial operations and PAN-India business would suffer irreparable hardship if immediate recovery proceeded. Balance of convenience favored granting the stay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2025 16:25:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1906 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464224</link>
      <description>ITAT (Agra) granted a stay of the outstanding addition under section 41(1) versus section 68 for 180 days or until appeal disposal, whichever is earlier. The tribunal found a prima facie case for the taxpayer since creditor identities, addresses and confirmations were furnished and subsequent-period payments were shown. It also accepted that the assessee&#039;s continuing industrial operations and PAN-India business would suffer irreparable hardship if immediate recovery proceeded. Balance of convenience favored granting the stay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>