<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 126 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47271</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed Civil Appeal No. 5948 of 1999 and Civil Appeal No. 4934 of 1999 against the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal&#039;s judgments. The value of secondary packing, like cardboard boxes, used for packing paints is not to be included in the assessable value of the goods. The Court did not allow the question of deductibility of trade discount as it was not raised in the appeals. The Appeals were dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 126 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47271</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed Civil Appeal No. 5948 of 1999 and Civil Appeal No. 4934 of 1999 against the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal&#039;s judgments. The value of secondary packing, like cardboard boxes, used for packing paints is not to be included in the assessable value of the goods. The Court did not allow the question of deductibility of trade discount as it was not raised in the appeals. The Appeals were dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>