<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 96 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47265</link>
    <description>The court set aside the orders of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) and the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Appellate Tribunal due to the petitioners&#039; adjournment request not being considered, violating principles of natural justice. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision, emphasizing the petitioners&#039; right to be heard. The petition was allowed, annulling the orders and instructing a reconsideration of the appeals with the petitioners given a fair opportunity to present their case. No costs were imposed on either party, with the petitioners undertaking not to seek further adjournments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:19:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 96 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47265</link>
      <description>The court set aside the orders of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) and the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Appellate Tribunal due to the petitioners&#039; adjournment request not being considered, violating principles of natural justice. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision, emphasizing the petitioners&#039; right to be heard. The petition was allowed, annulling the orders and instructing a reconsideration of the appeals with the petitioners given a fair opportunity to present their case. No costs were imposed on either party, with the petitioners undertaking not to seek further adjournments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>