<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Notional forex loss deletion upheld; residential property interest allowed; Section 14A read with Rule 8D deleted; directors&#039; travel partly disallowed</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93258</link>
    <description>ITAT upheld the deletion of the addition relating to a notional foreign-exchange loss on restatement of liabilities and assets, finding the assessee had pleaded and reconciled contract liabilities and applied AS-11 such that the alleged loss was revenue in nature and properly accrued; the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion was affirmed. ITAT also affirmed deletion of the disallowance for interest on a residential property, accepting its inclusion in the relevant block of assets. The Tribunal partly sustained the Revenue on directors&#039; foreign-travel expenses, imposing an additional disallowance of Rs.2,00,000 above the disallowed Rs.51,20,000. The section 14A read with Rule 8D addition was deleted for want of AO&#039;s satisfaction and proof of nexus.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2025 09:01:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2025 09:01:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Notional forex loss deletion upheld; residential property interest allowed; Section 14A read with Rule 8D deleted; directors&#039; travel partly disallowed</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93258</link>
      <description>ITAT upheld the deletion of the addition relating to a notional foreign-exchange loss on restatement of liabilities and assets, finding the assessee had pleaded and reconciled contract liabilities and applied AS-11 such that the alleged loss was revenue in nature and properly accrued; the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion was affirmed. ITAT also affirmed deletion of the disallowance for interest on a residential property, accepting its inclusion in the relevant block of assets. The Tribunal partly sustained the Revenue on directors&#039; foreign-travel expenses, imposing an additional disallowance of Rs.2,00,000 above the disallowed Rs.51,20,000. The section 14A read with Rule 8D addition was deleted for want of AO&#039;s satisfaction and proof of nexus.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2025 09:01:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>