https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779699 A prior mortgage does not, by itself, displace attachment of property under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002; a secured creditor's earlier charge was held not to override the money-laundering attachment. The attachment was therefore sustained. At the same time, the secured creditor was not barred from seeking appropriate relief before the jurisdictional Special Court under Section 8(7) or Section 8(8), and the statutory route for release or other relief remained available under the Act. en-us Thu, 09 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Oct 2025 09:01:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779699 A prior mortgage does not, by itself, displace attachment of property under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002; a secured creditor's earlier charge was held not to override the money-laundering attachment. The attachment was therefore sustained. At the same time, the secured creditor was not barred from seeking appropriate relief before the jurisdictional Special Court under Section 8(7) or Section 8(8), and the statutory route for release or other relief remained available under the Act. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 09 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779699