<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 506 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779710</link>
    <description>Customs authorities&#039; role in transfer of warehoused goods was confined to document scrutiny, and a writ court would not conclusively decide allegations of forged transfer papers where the matter was already under investigation and at the show-cause notice and adjudication stage. The prayer for release and re-export was declined, leaving the customs authorities to proceed in accordance with law under the Customs regime. The alleged non-payment of contractual consideration was treated as a private dispute between the contracting parties and was not decided in writ jurisdiction. Civil remedies for recovery were preserved, and the petition was disposed of without granting the requested relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2025 09:01:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 506 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779710</link>
      <description>Customs authorities&#039; role in transfer of warehoused goods was confined to document scrutiny, and a writ court would not conclusively decide allegations of forged transfer papers where the matter was already under investigation and at the show-cause notice and adjudication stage. The prayer for release and re-export was declined, leaving the customs authorities to proceed in accordance with law under the Customs regime. The alleged non-payment of contractual consideration was treated as a private dispute between the contracting parties and was not decided in writ jurisdiction. Civil remedies for recovery were preserved, and the petition was disposed of without granting the requested relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>