<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 522 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779726</link>
    <description>Capital introduced by newly admitted partners in an LLP cannot, by that fact alone, be assessed in the LLP&#039;s hands as unexplained investment under section 69. Where the addition is based only on the partners&#039; capital contribution, the entity is not automatically liable to tax the amount as unexplained in its own hands. The addition was therefore not sustainable in the assessee-LLP&#039;s hands, and the deletion by the first appellate authority was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2025 09:01:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 522 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779726</link>
      <description>Capital introduced by newly admitted partners in an LLP cannot, by that fact alone, be assessed in the LLP&#039;s hands as unexplained investment under section 69. Where the addition is based only on the partners&#039; capital contribution, the entity is not automatically liable to tax the amount as unexplained in its own hands. The addition was therefore not sustainable in the assessee-LLP&#039;s hands, and the deletion by the first appellate authority was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>