https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779727 ITAT held the CIT(A) order was cryptic and nonspeaking, having failed to apply mind to the assessee's submissions and additional evidence; the AO had also not filed the remand report without valid, substantiated reasons. Finding no proof that the AO's noncompliance was due to election duty or transfers, ITAT remanded the matter to the AO with directions to examine the additional evidence submitted by the assessee, obtain necessary records (including bank reports), and decide the assessment on merits. en-us Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Oct 2025 09:01:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779727 ITAT held the CIT(A) order was cryptic and nonspeaking, having failed to apply mind to the assessee's submissions and additional evidence; the AO had also not filed the remand report without valid, substantiated reasons. Finding no proof that the AO's noncompliance was due to election duty or transfers, ITAT remanded the matter to the AO with directions to examine the additional evidence submitted by the assessee, obtain necessary records (including bank reports), and decide the assessment on merits. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779727