<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 536 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779740</link>
    <description>HC quashed the respondents&#039; order under s.119(2)(b) and condoned a 784-day delay in filing Form No. 9A by a charitable trust. The court found AY 2016-17 was the first year Form 9A was mandated, recognized the possibility of inadvertent non-filing, noted Board circulars empowering condonation, and relied on consistent judicial approach favoring equitable, merits-based relief to avoid imposing tax liability where substantial compliance with s.11 existed. The delay was therefore excused and the impugned order set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 18:01:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 536 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779740</link>
      <description>HC quashed the respondents&#039; order under s.119(2)(b) and condoned a 784-day delay in filing Form No. 9A by a charitable trust. The court found AY 2016-17 was the first year Form 9A was mandated, recognized the possibility of inadvertent non-filing, noted Board circulars empowering condonation, and relied on consistent judicial approach favoring equitable, merits-based relief to avoid imposing tax liability where substantial compliance with s.11 existed. The delay was therefore excused and the impugned order set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>