https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779749 HC held that detention of goods was unlawful where goods moved under a valid agreement and accompanied by a genuine tax invoice and e-way bill, the vehicle broke down causing delay, and a new e-way bill was generated before issuance of the detention order under section 129(3) GST. The court ruled expiry of an e-way bill does not imply intent to evade tax and set aside the impugned orders, allowing the petition. en-us Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Oct 2025 09:01:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779749 HC held that detention of goods was unlawful where goods moved under a valid agreement and accompanied by a genuine tax invoice and e-way bill, the vehicle broke down causing delay, and a new e-way bill was generated before issuance of the detention order under section 129(3) GST. The court ruled expiry of an e-way bill does not imply intent to evade tax and set aside the impugned orders, allowing the petition. Case-Laws GST Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779749