https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464210 The SC entertained an appeal challenging CESTAT's conclusion that transfers between a head office and its branches constitute reimbursements and are not taxable services under section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994, and whether branches and head office are distinct taxable persons attracting reverse charge. The court noted the legal issue and issued notice, preserving CESTAT's reasoning as the central question for adjudication. Civil Appeal No. 5602 of 2015. en-us Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Oct 2025 21:29:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464210 The SC entertained an appeal challenging CESTAT's conclusion that transfers between a head office and its branches constitute reimbursements and are not taxable services under section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994, and whether branches and head office are distinct taxable persons attracting reverse charge. The court noted the legal issue and issued notice, preserving CESTAT's reasoning as the central question for adjudication. Civil Appeal No. 5602 of 2015. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464210