<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1954 (7) TMI 32 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464205</link>
    <description>Guarantee-based claims may fall within territorial jurisdiction where the guarantee is delivered and performed, even if a promissory note forms part of the transaction. Non-presentment of a promissory note does not bar recovery where the claim is enforced under the guarantee and presentment could not be made at the specified place. A negative lien or covenant to keep assets unencumbered does not, without clear recourse rights over property, create a charge, hypothecation, or floating charge capable of discharging a surety. The surety&#039;s liability remains coextensive with the principal debtor&#039;s contractual liability, so liquidation-related cessation of interest against the debtor does not itself end interest liability under the guarantee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1954 (7) TMI 32 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464205</link>
      <description>Guarantee-based claims may fall within territorial jurisdiction where the guarantee is delivered and performed, even if a promissory note forms part of the transaction. Non-presentment of a promissory note does not bar recovery where the claim is enforced under the guarantee and presentment could not be made at the specified place. A negative lien or covenant to keep assets unencumbered does not, without clear recourse rights over property, create a charge, hypothecation, or floating charge capable of discharging a surety. The surety&#039;s liability remains coextensive with the principal debtor&#039;s contractual liability, so liquidation-related cessation of interest against the debtor does not itself end interest liability under the guarantee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>