<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1637 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464200</link>
    <description>SLP to SC dismissed for gross delay of 177 days without satisfactory explanation; on merits the SC declined to disturb the HC order. The HC had held that TRQ benefits extended until 30.06.2023 cover imports made under the extant policy where bills of lading are dated on or before 31.03.2023, provided the goods landed before 30.06.2023. HC&#039;s finding that AIDC was illegally imposed and entitlement to refund of duty in relevant cases was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 13:48:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1637 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464200</link>
      <description>SLP to SC dismissed for gross delay of 177 days without satisfactory explanation; on merits the SC declined to disturb the HC order. The HC had held that TRQ benefits extended until 30.06.2023 cover imports made under the extant policy where bills of lading are dated on or before 31.03.2023, provided the goods landed before 30.06.2023. HC&#039;s finding that AIDC was illegally imposed and entitlement to refund of duty in relevant cases was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>