<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Stamp Duty: The instrument labelled Security Bond cum Mortgage Deed is a mortgage under Article 40, not covered by Article 57</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93208</link>
    <description>The SC affirmed the High Court&#039;s dismissal of the appeal, holding the instrument labelled a &quot;Security Bond cum Mortgage Deed&quot; is, in substance, a mortgage deed chargeable under Article 40 of Sch.1-B of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, not falling within Article 57. The Court found the instrument transferred the appellant&#039;s interest in specified properties to the development authority to secure performance and payment obligations, thereby satisfying the statutory definition of mortgage. Article 57&#039;s second limb applies only to surety-executed securities; absent any surety and with the principal debtor executing the deed, Article 57 is inapplicable. The appeal was dismissed and the High Court orders upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 08:44:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 08:44:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Stamp Duty: The instrument labelled Security Bond cum Mortgage Deed is a mortgage under Article 40, not covered by Article 57</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93208</link>
      <description>The SC affirmed the High Court&#039;s dismissal of the appeal, holding the instrument labelled a &quot;Security Bond cum Mortgage Deed&quot; is, in substance, a mortgage deed chargeable under Article 40 of Sch.1-B of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, not falling within Article 57. The Court found the instrument transferred the appellant&#039;s interest in specified properties to the development authority to secure performance and payment obligations, thereby satisfying the statutory definition of mortgage. Article 57&#039;s second limb applies only to surety-executed securities; absent any surety and with the principal debtor executing the deed, Article 57 is inapplicable. The appeal was dismissed and the High Court orders upheld.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 08:44:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>