<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 447 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779651</link>
    <description>The HC noted that the SC reversed a Full Bench decision upholding amendments to Section 26(6A)-(6C), and the impugned provisions have been struck down. Consequently, the petitioner is no longer required to deposit 10% as pre-deposit; the pending appeal must be decided on merits in accordance with law without insisting on the 10% pre-deposit. Interim relief granted is continued for six weeks from today. The petition is disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 08:44:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 447 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779651</link>
      <description>The HC noted that the SC reversed a Full Bench decision upholding amendments to Section 26(6A)-(6C), and the impugned provisions have been struck down. Consequently, the petitioner is no longer required to deposit 10% as pre-deposit; the pending appeal must be decided on merits in accordance with law without insisting on the 10% pre-deposit. Interim relief granted is continued for six weeks from today. The petition is disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>