<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 456 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779660</link>
    <description>CESTAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the impugned order, thereby dropping the service tax demand for the post-negative list period (1.7.2012-31.3.2015) on manpower services provided by an overseas group company to its Indian group affiliate. The Tribunal treated the debit entries as internal chargebacks for deployed staff executing the overseas principal&#039;s contracts, not as taxable manpower supply or recruitment services, and distinguished the Apex Court decision relied upon by the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 10:21:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 456 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779660</link>
      <description>CESTAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the impugned order, thereby dropping the service tax demand for the post-negative list period (1.7.2012-31.3.2015) on manpower services provided by an overseas group company to its Indian group affiliate. The Tribunal treated the debit entries as internal chargebacks for deployed staff executing the overseas principal&#039;s contracts, not as taxable manpower supply or recruitment services, and distinguished the Apex Court decision relied upon by the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>