<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 458 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779662</link>
    <description>A change in the constitution of a successful resolution applicant requires the Committee of Creditors to first examine whether the reconstituted applicant remains eligible to proceed and whether the resolution plan can still be pursued in its altered form. The statutory role of the authorised representative also remains central where class creditors seek replacement of the resolution professional: if the requisite support exists, a meeting of the Committee of Creditors may be convened and the request considered in accordance with the insolvency framework. Challenges to a remand order are not excluded merely because earlier approval issues or consent objections are raised, where the remand itself reopens the matter for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 08:44:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 458 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779662</link>
      <description>A change in the constitution of a successful resolution applicant requires the Committee of Creditors to first examine whether the reconstituted applicant remains eligible to proceed and whether the resolution plan can still be pursued in its altered form. The statutory role of the authorised representative also remains central where class creditors seek replacement of the resolution professional: if the requisite support exists, a meeting of the Committee of Creditors may be convened and the request considered in accordance with the insolvency framework. Challenges to a remand order are not excluded merely because earlier approval issues or consent objections are raised, where the remand itself reopens the matter for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>