<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 131 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47227</link>
    <description>A concessional-duty notification for paper and paperboard made by smaller mills using unconventional raw materials was held not to be limited exclusively to clearances for home consumption. Reading the notification as a whole, the limits linked to home-consumption clearances operated as a ceiling for domestic clearances, while the remaining concessional clearances could be exports, provided the prescribed domestic-clearance limits were not exceeded. The Tribunal&#039;s conclusion on this issue was upheld, although its reasoning was not fully endorsed. The governing principle is that an exemption or concessional-duty notification fixing home-consumption limits does not require all clearances to be for home consumption unless the text expressly says so.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2014 10:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 131 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47227</link>
      <description>A concessional-duty notification for paper and paperboard made by smaller mills using unconventional raw materials was held not to be limited exclusively to clearances for home consumption. Reading the notification as a whole, the limits linked to home-consumption clearances operated as a ceiling for domestic clearances, while the remaining concessional clearances could be exports, provided the prescribed domestic-clearance limits were not exceeded. The Tribunal&#039;s conclusion on this issue was upheld, although its reasoning was not fully endorsed. The governing principle is that an exemption or concessional-duty notification fixing home-consumption limits does not require all clearances to be for home consumption unless the text expressly says so.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>