https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464178 A civil suit challenging revenue orders was not maintainable where an appeal or revision on the same subject matter was already pending before the Divisional Commissioner, because a party cannot simultaneously pursue parallel and inconsistent remedies on the same cause of action. The plaint rejection request was wrongly decided by focusing only on the existence of a cause of action and not on the legal effect of the pending proceedings and the election of remedy. The plaint was therefore liable to be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. en-us Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Oct 2025 20:48:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464178 A civil suit challenging revenue orders was not maintainable where an appeal or revision on the same subject matter was already pending before the Divisional Commissioner, because a party cannot simultaneously pursue parallel and inconsistent remedies on the same cause of action. The plaint rejection request was wrongly decided by focusing only on the existence of a cause of action and not on the legal effect of the pending proceedings and the election of remedy. The plaint was therefore liable to be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464178