<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1493 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464195</link>
    <description>HC held the reopening under u/s 148 invalid and quashed reassessment proceedings because the Addl. CIT did not record satisfaction on the reasons provided by the AO and the AO failed to follow the mandatory procedural requirements laid down by the SC for issuing a reopening notice. The appellate court allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 20:48:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1493 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464195</link>
      <description>HC held the reopening under u/s 148 invalid and quashed reassessment proceedings because the Addl. CIT did not record satisfaction on the reasons provided by the AO and the AO failed to follow the mandatory procedural requirements laid down by the SC for issuing a reopening notice. The appellate court allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>