<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 384 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779588</link>
    <description>A clarificatory fraud-management regime did not wipe out a pending show-cause notice issued under the earlier directions, so the fraud-determination process could continue if natural justice was observed. The governing standard was audi alteram partem: notice, disclosure of the material relied upon, and an opportunity to file a written response were required before an adverse fraud classification. A personal hearing was not treated as mandatory in every case unless expressly provided. The article also notes that where a company&#039;s account is classified as fraud, persons in control may face consequential action even without a separate specific allegation against them, if their control is otherwise established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 08:54:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 384 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779588</link>
      <description>A clarificatory fraud-management regime did not wipe out a pending show-cause notice issued under the earlier directions, so the fraud-determination process could continue if natural justice was observed. The governing standard was audi alteram partem: notice, disclosure of the material relied upon, and an opportunity to file a written response were required before an adverse fraud classification. A personal hearing was not treated as mandatory in every case unless expressly provided. The article also notes that where a company&#039;s account is classified as fraud, persons in control may face consequential action even without a separate specific allegation against them, if their control is otherwise established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>