<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 93 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47204</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeals, setting aside the order that relied on the depreciation method for determining the assessable value of imported machinery. The Court directed that the assessable value should be based on the invoice value of all six imported machines, emphasizing the importance of considering the transaction value and acceptability of the declared value. The Tribunal&#039;s inconsistent decision was criticized, leading to the decision in favor of using invoice value for customs duty assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 16:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 93 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47204</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeals, setting aside the order that relied on the depreciation method for determining the assessable value of imported machinery. The Court directed that the assessable value should be based on the invoice value of all six imported machines, emphasizing the importance of considering the transaction value and acceptability of the declared value. The Tribunal&#039;s inconsistent decision was criticized, leading to the decision in favor of using invoice value for customs duty assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>