<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 398 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779602</link>
    <description>Bombay HC held that, having considered the appellant&#039;s age and health and the Supreme Court&#039;s principles on undue hardship, justice required granting an additional opportunity to deposit the pre-deposit amount. The court ordered the appellant to pay the required sum within eight weeks from the date of the order and denied any further extensions for any reason. The stay/appeal relief is therefore conditional on strict compliance with this eight-week deadline.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 14:59:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 398 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779602</link>
      <description>Bombay HC held that, having considered the appellant&#039;s age and health and the Supreme Court&#039;s principles on undue hardship, justice required granting an additional opportunity to deposit the pre-deposit amount. The court ordered the appellant to pay the required sum within eight weeks from the date of the order and denied any further extensions for any reason. The stay/appeal relief is therefore conditional on strict compliance with this eight-week deadline.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>