<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 406 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779610</link>
    <description>Compensation received on compulsory acquisition of land was treated as exempt because the land&#039;s character at the time of acquisition was held to be decisive. Mere non-cultivation for a prolonged period was insufficient to deny its agricultural nature, so the receipt in lieu of such land was not taxable. The separate argument based on the CBDT circular was not examined further because the matter was resolved on the principal issue in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 08:54:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 406 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779610</link>
      <description>Compensation received on compulsory acquisition of land was treated as exempt because the land&#039;s character at the time of acquisition was held to be decisive. Mere non-cultivation for a prolonged period was insufficient to deny its agricultural nature, so the receipt in lieu of such land was not taxable. The separate argument based on the CBDT circular was not examined further because the matter was resolved on the principal issue in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>