<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 409 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779613</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed the taxpayer&#039;s appeal, treating late filing of Form 67 as a directory, not mandatory, requirement per precedent from the HC, and found merit in the substantive ground. The tribunal set aside the denial of foreign tax credit and remitted the matter to the AO to verify facts and recompute tax consequences afresh. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 08:54:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 409 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779613</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed the taxpayer&#039;s appeal, treating late filing of Form 67 as a directory, not mandatory, requirement per precedent from the HC, and found merit in the substantive ground. The tribunal set aside the denial of foreign tax credit and remitted the matter to the AO to verify facts and recompute tax consequences afresh. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>